Shape constancy, not size constancy: A (partial) explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion
نویسنده
چکیده
The Müller-Lyer illusion is one of the best-known and most frequently examined optical illusions. After pointing out that it is unlikely that any one account would give a full explanation for all the features of this illusion, I argue for two claims. First, I aim to point out that an essential component of the Müller-Lyer illusion has something to do with picture perception (just as Gregory initially claimed). Second, I give an account of this essential component of the Müller-Lyer illusion that is not susceptible to the counterexamples and objections Gregory’s inappropriate size constancy scaling theory was susceptible to. The gist of my account is that the Müller-Lyer illusion is explained not by inappropriate size constancy scaling, but by inappropriate shape constancy scaling.
منابع مشابه
A (partial) explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion
The Müller-Lyer illusion is one of the best-known and most frequently examined optical illusions. After pointing out that it is unlikely that any one account would give a full explanation for all the features of this illusion, I argue for two claims. First, I aim to point out that an essential component of the Müller-Lyer illusion has something to do with picture perception (just as Gregory ini...
متن کاملContrasting Three Popular Explanations for the Muller-Lyer Illusion
Problem statement: Using the method of adjustment, participants compared the line lengths of ‘dumbbell’ and ‘spectacle’ versions of Muller-Lyer (circles and ovals at the endpoints in place of arrowheads). Approach: Three popular competing explanations for the illusion (conflicting cues, misapplied size constancy scaling and confusion hypothesis) make differing predictions concerning the pattern...
متن کاملThe role of context in Müller-Lyer illusion: The case of negative Müller-Lyer illusion
The majority of optical illusions are the result of the specific context manipulation of the critical part of the stimuli. There are different examples of how context distorts figures in a way that they might seem different in size, shape, or shade. In the particular case of the Müller-Lyer (ML) illusion, the critical part of the stimulus is the central line (shaft), while the fins represent th...
متن کاملExplaining Ponzo’s illusion: Assimilation and tilt constancy theories revisited
Prinzmetal, et al. (2001) criticized the explanation offered by Pressey’s assimilation theory of Ponzo’s illusion on the basis of experimental results that they obtained and on findings by others. However, it is shown that their experiment was improperly designed because of a failure to appreciate the manner in which a gap between fins and shaft alters Müller-Lyer’s illusion. Additional critici...
متن کاملThe neural mechanisms underlying the Müller-Lyer illusion and its interaction with visuospatial judgments.
Arrows terminating a line can distort the perceived line length. This so-called Müller-Lyer illusion can be used in healthy human subjects to mimic the performance of neglect patients in visuospatial judgments (e.g., in the landmark task). In this study, we investigated the neural mechanisms underlying the Müller-Lyer illusion, the landmark task, and their interaction. This was achieved by para...
متن کامل